That's not a very good argument.
The bible has to be interpreted differently than the plain meaning of the words because otherwise it's immoral, self-contradictory, bigoted and doesn't fit with modern understanding, morality or facts.
But let's take an example from science. The equations of motion are used today as they were when they were written. We've learned there are more accurate models, and sometimes need to apply those, but we still read his writings as written.
we've also invented a way to apply his methods and equations to more objects that have been invented since, which is a form of reinterpreting, but a distinctly different one.
Source: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotScience/~3/YKPOlWNTCfc/story01.htm
Lolo Jones Marvin Hamlisch Megan Rossee grenada grenada Sikh Sanya Richards Ross
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.